Journal Search Engine
Search Advanced Search Adode Reader(link)
Download PDF Export Citaion korean bibliography PMC previewer
ISSN : 2233-4165(Print)
ISSN : 2233-5382(Online)
Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business Vol.11 No.2 pp.49-59
DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.13106/jidb.2020.vol11.no2.49

A Study on the Opt-in Marketing

Won-Kyo OH*,Won-Jun LEE**
*First Author. Department of Business Administration, Cheongju University, Korea, Email: owon21@naver.com

© Copyright: Korean Distribution Science Association (KODISA)
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
**Corresponding Author. Professor, Department of Business Administration, Cheongju University, Korea, [Postal Address: Research Lab Bld. #10-507, Cheongju University, Naeduk-dong, Cheongwon-gu, Cheongju, Chungbuk, 28503, Korea] Email: marketing@cju.ac.kr
December 31, 2019 January 30, 2020 February 05, 2020

Abstract

Purpose: Online and social media and mobile shopping are increasing and companies are required to provide personal information in order to supplement the non-invasive characteristics of the channels. With the increased provision of personal information, consumers' personal and social concerns about the prevention of personal information infringement are also increasing, and in response, personal or opt-in marketing has emerged to compensate for reckless information abuse. Despite the background of this emergence, the existing prior studies are limited to ignoring the negative feelings of consumers in the real world, including only the net function and positive effect of the opt-in mail. Research design, data and methodology: The research framework was intended to utilize the impact of human marketing activities on consumer attitudes combined with positive and negative factors. Factors that positively affect attitudes toward permation marketing were presented, such as informality, and perceived risks were presented as negative impact factors. Also, based on previous prior research, the prior factors of opt-in marketing were to present the effect on purchase intent through the medium of attitude toward opt-in marketing. Results: In this study, we used the framework of a two factor theory to address positive and negative factors as a leading factor in the customer attitude toward opt-in mail advertising, and as a result, functionality and personalization have a positive effect on customer attitude and perceived risk have a negative impact on customer attitude. In addition, it was confirmed that the customer attitude formed this way affects the intention to purchase again. Conclusions: This study suggests that we have demonstrated that marketing, an opt-in marketing that has been recognized as part of marketing that is deployed after obtaining customer consent, has been applied without any other marketing methodology. E-mail advertising at this point also provides practical implications that the system safeguards are in place under an opt-in protocol or system, and that even if an e-mail advertisement is carried out, customers will need to look at the level of awareness about the risks, and suggests that they need to consider the customer’s journey that could lead to purchase at the content level.

JEL Classification Code: M15, M31, M37

초록


    Figure

    Table

    Reference

    1. Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665-694.
    2. Ahmad, A. E. M. K., & Al-Zu’bi, H. A. (2011). E-banking functionality and outcomes of customer satisfaction: an empirical investigation. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 3(1), 50-65.
    3. Bai, B., Law, R., & Wen, I. (2008). The impact of website quality on customer satisfaction and purchase intentions: Evidence from Chinese online visitors. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27(3), 391-402.
    4. Bauer, H. H., Hammerschmidt, M., & Falk, T. (2005). Measuring the quality of e-banking portals. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 23(2), 153-175.
    5. Bellman, S., Johnson, E. J., & Lohse, G. L. (2001). On site: To opt-in or opt-out? It depends on the question. Communications of the ACM, 44(2), 25-27.
    6. Bradburn, N. M., Rips, L. J., & Shevell, S. K. (1987). Answering autobiographical questions: The impact of memory and inference on surveys. Science, 236(4798), 157-161.
    7. Bredahl, L. (2001). Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified food–results of a cross-national survey. Journal of Consumer Policy, 24(1), 23-61.
    8. Brown, S. P., & Stayman, D. M. (1992). Antecedent and consequences of attitude toward the Ad: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(1), 34-5.
    9. Bahn, K. D., & Wright, N. D. (2001), Antecedents of green product purchase behavior. The Academy of Marketing Studies, 6(2), 51-55.
    10. Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and Validity Assessment. New York, USA: Sage Publications.
    11. Chitturi, R., Raghunathan, R., & Mahajan, V. (2007). Form versus function: How the intensities of specific emotions evoked in functional versus hedonic trade-offs mediate product preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(4), 702-714.
    12. Converse, J. M., & Presser, S. (1986). Survey questions: Handcrafting the standardized questionnaire. New York, USA: Sage.
    13. Campbell, D. E., & Wright, R. T. (2008). Shut-up I don’t care: Understanding the role of relevance and interactivity on customer attitudes toward repetitive online advertising. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 9(1), 62-76.
    14. Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: the role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 81-93.
    15. Duffett, R. G. (2015). The influence of Facebook advertising on cognitive attitudes amid Generation Y. Electronic Commerce Research, 15(2), 243-267.
    16. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
    17. Davis, J. F. (1997). Property rights to consumer information: A proposed policy framework for direct marketing. Journal of Direct Marketing, 11(3), 32-43.
    18. Ducoffe, R. H. (1996). Advertising value and advertising on the web-blog@ management. Journal of Advertising Research, 36(5), 21-32.
    19. DuFrene, D. D., Engelland, B. T., Lehman, C. M., & Pearson, R. A. (2005). Changes in consumer attitudes resulting from participation in a permission e-mail campaign. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 27(1), 65-77.
    20. Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 11-27.
    21. Fan, Q. J., Kim, W. K., & Cui, G. (2010). Influence of marketing mix on customers attitude and purchase intention-mediating effects of customer experiences. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 10(8), 292-300.
    22. Foxman, E. R., & Kilcoyne, P. (1993). Information technology, marketing practice, and consumer privacy: Ethical issues. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 12(1), 106-119.
    23. Godin, S. (1999). Permission marketing: Turning strangers into friends and friends into customers. New York, USA: Simon and Schuster.
    24. Gorla, N. (2012). Information systems service quality, zone of tolerance, and user satisfaction. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing(JOEUC), 24(2), 50-73.
    25. Gefen, D. (2002). Customer Loyalty in E-Commerce. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 3(0), 27-51.
    26. Herzberg, F., & Mausner, B. Snyderman. (1959). The motivation to work. New York, USA: Villey.
    27. Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T. P., & Peralta, M. A. (1999). Information privacy in the marketspace: Implications for the commercial uses of anonymity on the web. The Information Society, 15(2), 129-139.
    28. Holbrook, M. B., & Batra, R. (1987). Assessing the role of emotions as mediators of consumer responses to advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 404-420.
    29. Jang, Y. S., Baek, S. W., & Kim, S. H. (2018). The effects of brand equity on consumer attitude and behavior: Food market in vietnam. Journal of Distribution Science, 16(1), 17-27.
    30. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., & Vitale, M. (2000). Consumer trust in an internet store information technology and management. Journal of Information Systems, 12(1), 41-48.
    31. Jacoby, J., & Kaplan, L. (1972). The component of perceived risk. Proceedings 3rd Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer Research, 3(3), 382-393.
    32. Kahn, R., & Cannell, C. (1957). The dynamics of interviewing, New York, USA: Wiley.
    33. Kim, H. S., Choi, Y. S., & Shin, C. S. (2019). Relationship among restaurant owner’s SNS marketing, trust, purchase intention, and word of mouth intention. Journal of Distribution Science, 17(7), 27-38.
    34. Kim, M. J. & Park, C. J. (2019). Does customer delight matter in the customer satisfaction-loyalty linkage?. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 6(3), 235-245.
    35. Li, W., & Huang, Z. (2016). The research of influence factors of online behavioral advertising avoidance. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 6(9), 947.
    36. Lewis, I. M., Watson, B., & White, K. M. (2010). Response efficacy: The key to minimizing rejection and maximizing acceptance of emotion-based anti-speeding messages. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(2), 459-467.
    37. Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Agarwal, J. (2004). Internet users' information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Information Systems Research, 15(4), 336-355.
    38. Milne, G. R., & Rohm, A. J. (2000). Consumer privacy and name removal across direct marketing channels: Exploring opt-in and opt-out alternatives. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 19(2), 238-249.
    39. MacKenzie, S. B., Lutz, R. J., & Belch, G. E. (1986). The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. Journal of marketing research, 23(2), 130-143.
    40. Mitchell, A. A., & Olson, J. C. (1981). Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude?. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 318-332.
    41. Norberg, P. A., Horne, D. R., & Horne, D. A. (2007). The privacy paradox: Personal information disclosure intentions versus behaviors. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 41(1), 100-126.
    42. Palmer, J. W., & Griffith, D. A. (1998). An emerging model of Web site design for marketing. Communications of the ACM, 41(3), 44-51.
    43. Personal Information Protection Commission. (2017). Personal information protection annual report. Seoul, Korea: PIPC (Personal Information Protection Commission) .
    44. Personal Information Protection Commission. (2019). Personal information protection annual report. Seoul, Korea: PIPC (Personal Information Protection Commission) .
    45. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544.
    46. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879.
    47. Peter, J. P., & Ryan, M. J. (1976). An investigation of perceived risk at the brand level. Journal of Marketing Research, 13(2), 184-188.
    48. Ramkumar, G. (2007). Image recognition as a method for opt-in and applications for mobile marketing. International Journal of Mobile Marketing, 2(2), 42-49.
    49. Smith, H. J., Milberg, S. J., & Burke, S. J. (1996). Information privacy: Measuring individuals' concerns about organizational practices. MIS Quarterly, 20(0), 167-196.
    50. Smith, Robert E. and William R. Swinyard. (1982). Information response models: An integrated approach. Journal of Marketing, 46(4), 81-93.
    51. Swan, J. E., & Combs, L. J. (1976). Product performance and consumer satisfaction: A new concept: An empirical study examines the influence of physical and psychological dimensions of product performance on consumer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing, 40(2), 25-33.
    52. Szymanski, D. M., & Hise, R. T. (2000). E-satisfaction: An initial examination. Journal of Retailing, 76(3), 309-322.
    53. Stayman, D. M., & Aaker, D.A. (1988). Are all effects of Ad-induced feeling mediated by Ad?. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 368-373.
    54. Sinkovics, R. R., Pezderka, N., & Haghirian, P. (2012). Determinants of consumer perceptions toward mobile advertising—a comparison between Japan and Austria. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(1), 21-32.
    55. Tezinde, T., Smith, B., & Murphy, J. (2002). Getting permission: Exploring factors affecting permission marketing, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16(4), 28-36.
    56. Tsang, M. M., Ho, S. C., & Liang, T. P. (2004). Consumer attitudes toward mobile advertising: An empirical study. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8(3), 65-78.
    57. Ur, B., Leon, P. G., Cranor, L. F., Shay, R., & Wang, Y. (2012). Smart, useful, scary, creepy: Perceptions of online behavioral advertising. In Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, 4(0), 1-15.
    58. Westin, A. F. (2003). Social and political dimensions of privacy. Journal of Social Issues, 59(2), 431-453.