Journal Search Engine
Search Advanced Search Adode Reader(link)
Download PDF Export Citaion korean bibliography PMC previewer
ISSN : 2233-4165(Print)
ISSN : 2233-5382(Online)
Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business Vol.10 No.7 pp.49-58
DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.13106/ijidb.2019.vol10.no7.49

The Effect of Appeal Type of Advertisement on Consumer’s Prosocial Behavior: Focusing on the Moderating Effect of Social Exclusion

Eun-Young PARK*
* First Author, Institute for Business Research & Education at Korea University Business School, Seoul, Korea.E-mail: eyoung.park317@gmail.com
April 25, 2019. May 05, 2019. June 05, 2019.

Abstract

Purpose - Previous studies on the influence of appeal types of advertising messages on pro-social behavior have shown inconsistent results. The purpose of this study is to examine whether the appeal type of advertising affects consumer’s prosocial behavior. In particular, the authors investigated whether the social exclusion moderates the relationship between the appeal type of advertising and prosocial behavior.
Research design, data and Methodology - To verify the hypothesis, two experimental study were conducted. The experimental study was 2(appeal type : self-benefit vs. other-benefit) by 2(social exclusion : being ignored vs. being rejected) between-subject design. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four conditions. The experiment was conducted using a computer. First, the participants was exposed to the advertising image used in the social campaign, and then responded to questions about social behavior. The participants completed the experiment after further responding to the item for manipulation check and demographic measure. The experiment took about 10 minutes in total.
Results - In Study 1, a global warming campaign with participation intention variable, other-benefit ads rather than self-benefit ads drive consumers who feel socially rejected to be more willing and likely to participate, but consumers who feel socially ignored are more likely to participate the campaign in self-benefit ad than other-benefit ad. Study 2 replicates the findings, a child poverty relief campaign with an amount-to-donate variable: consumers who feel explicitly rejected allocate more dollars to the charity in response to other-benefit rather than self-benefit ads, but consumers who being ignored are willing to donate more money.
Conclusion - This study has theoretical contribution in that it expands existing theories by explaining the existing inconsistent results of the message appeal influence on pro-social behavior through new control variables. In addition, the results have important managerial implications, suggesting marketers should tailor their marketing message to match the consumer situation.

JEL Classifications: M00, M3, M30, M31, M37.

메시지 소구유형이 친사회적 행동에 미치는 영향: 사회적 배제의 조절효과를 중심으로

박은영*

초록


    Figure

    Table

    Reference

    1. Allen, C. T. (1982). Self-perception based strategies for stimulating energy conservation. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(4), 381-390.
    2. Baek, T. H., Yoon, S., Kim, S., & Kim, Y. (2019). Social exclusion influences on the effectiveness of altruistic versus egoistic appeals in charitable advertising. Marketing Letters, 30(1), 75-90.
    3. Batson, C. D. (1990). How social an animal? The human capacity for caring. American Psychologist, 45(3), 336.
    4. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
    5. Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Ciarocco, N. J., & Twenge, J. M. (2005). Social exclusion impairs self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(4), 589-604.
    6. Bendapudi, N., Singh, S. N., & Bendapudi, V. (1996). Enhancing helping behavior: An integrative framework for promotion planning. Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 33-49.
    7. Brunel, F. F., & Nelson, M. R. (2000). Explaining gendered responses to “help-self” and “help-others” charity ad appeals: The mediating role of world-views. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 15-28.
    8. Buckley, K. E., Winkel, R. E., & Leary, M. R. (2004). Reactions to acceptance and rejection: Effects of level and sequence of relational evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(1), 14-28.
    9. Cacioppo, J. T., Chen, H. Y., & Cacioppo, S. (2017). Reciprocal influences between loneliness and self-centeredness: A cross-lagged panel analysis in a population-based sample of African American, Hispanic, and Caucasian adults. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(8), 1125-1135.
    10. Cheung, E. O., & Gardner, W. L. (2015). The way I make you feel: Social exclusion enhances the ability to manage others' emotions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 59-75.
    11. Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S. L., Lewis, B. P., Luce, C., & Neuberg, S. L. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathy–altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of personality and social psychology, 73(3), 481-494.
    12. De Groot, J. I., & Steg, L. (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: How to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40(3), 330-354.
    13. DeBono, A. E. (2011). Why am I left out? Interpretations of exclusion affect anti-social and pro-social behaviors. State University of New York at Albany.
    14. DeWall, C. N., & Baumeister, R. F. (2006). Alone but feeling no pain: Effects of social exclusion on physical pain tolerance and pain threshold, affective forecasting, and interpersonal empathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(1), 1-54.
    15. Dovidio, J. F., Allen, J. L., & Schroeder, D. A. (1990). Specificity of empathy-induced helping: Evidence for altruistic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(2), 249-260.
    16. Fisher, R. J., Vandenbosch, M., & Antia, K. D. (2008). An empathy-helping perspective on consumers' responses to fund-raising appeals. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 519-531.
    17. Gardner, W. L., Pickett, C. L., & Brewer, M. B. (2000). Social exclusion and selective memory: How the need to belong influences memory for social events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(4), 486-496.
    18. Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392-404.
    19. Hess, Y. D., & Pickett, C. L. (2010). Social rejection and self-versus other-awareness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(2), 453-456.
    20. Holmes, J. G., Miller, D. T., & Lerner, M. J. (2002). Committing altruism under the cloak of self-interest: The exchange fiction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(2), 144-151.
    21. Kemp, E., Moore, D. J., & Cowart, K. (2016). Me, myself, and I: examining the effect of loneliness and self-focus on message referents. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 37(1), 15-27.
    22. Knowles, M. L. (2014). Social rejection increases perspective taking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 126-132.
    23. Lakin, J. L., Chartrand, T. L., & Arkin, R. M. (2008). I am too just like you: Nonconscious mimicry as an automatic behavioral response to social exclusion. Psychological Science, 19(8), 816-822.
    24. Lee, J., & Shrum, L. J. (2012). Conspicuous consumption versus charitable behavior in response to social exclusion: A differential needs explanation. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), 530-544.
    25. Loveland, K. E., Smeesters, D., & Mandel, N. (2010). Still preoccupied with 1995: The need to belong and preference for nostalgic products. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(3), 393-408.
    26. Luchs, M. G., Naylor, R. W., Irwin, J. R., & Raghunathan, R. (2010). The sustainability liability: Potential negative effects of ethicality on product preference. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 18-31.
    27. Maner, J. K., DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., & Schaller, M. (2007). Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the" porcupine problem." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 42-55.
    28. Mathur, A. (1996). Older adults' motivations for gift giving to charitable organizations: An exchange theory perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 13(1), 107-123.
    29. Mead, N. L., Baumeister, R. F., Stillman, T. F., Rawn, C. D., & Vohs, K. D. (2010). Social exclusion causes people to spend and consume strategically in the service of affiliation. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(5), 902-919.
    30. Molden, D. C., Lucas, G. M., Gardner, W. L., Dean, K., & Knowles, M. L. (2009). Motivations for prevention or promotion following social exclusion: Being rejected versus being ignored. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(2), 415-431.
    31. Oh, M. J. & Hwang, Y. (2014). Does social exclusion decrease ethical consumption behavior?. Journal of Consumer Studies, 25(4), 181-203.
    32. Oh, M. J., Park, K. K., & Park, J. C. (2017). Will Hedonic Products Appeal to Social Exclusion?. Journal of Cultural Industry Studies, 17(3), 55-63.
    33. Peattie, K. (2001). Towards sustainability: the third age of green marketing. The Marketing Review, 2(2), 129-146.
    34. Peattie, K., & Crane, A. (2005). Green marketing: legend, myth, farce or prophesy?. Qualitative Market Research: an International Journal, 8(4), 357-370.
    35. Son, J. S. & Lee, B. K. (2016). The effects of social exclusion and recipient’s facial expression on consumer responses to public service advertisement: Focused on Duchenne smile and sad face. The Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology, 17(2), 357-374.
    36. Stephens, N., &Gwinner, K. P. (1998). Why don’t some people complain? A cognitive-emotive process model of consumer complaint behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(3), 172-189.
    37. Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424.
    38. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). An integrated model of waste management behavior: A test of household recycling and composting intentions. Environment and Behavior, 27(5), 603-630.
    39. Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Stucke, T. S. (2001). If you can't join them, beat them: Effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1058-1069.
    40. Warburton, W. A., Williams, K. D., & Cairns, D. R. (2006). When ostracism leads to aggression: The moderating effects of control deprivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(2), 213-220.
    41. Webb, D. J., Mohr, L. A., & Harris, K. E. (2008). A re-examination of socially responsible consumption and its measurement. Journal of Business Research, 61(2), 91-98.
    42. Westbrook, R. A. (1980). Intrapersonal affective influences on consumer satisfaction with products. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(1), 49-54.
    43. White, K., & Peloza, J. (2009). Self-benefit versus other-benefit marketing appeals: Their effectiveness in generating charitable support. Journal of Marketing, 73(4), 109-124.
    44. Williams, K. D., Cheung, C. K., & Choi, W. (2000).Cyberostracism: effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 748-762.
    45. Zeelenberg, M., &Pieters, R. (2004). Beyond valence in customer dissatisfaction: A review and new findings on behavioral responses to regret and disappointment in failed services. Journal of business Research, 57(4), 445-455.