Journal Search Engine
Search Advanced Search Adode Reader(link)
Download PDF Export Citaion korean bibliography PMC previewer
ISSN : 2233-4165(Print)
ISSN : 2233-5382(Online)
Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business Vol.9 No.11 pp.67-76
DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.13106/ijidb.2018.vol9.no11.67.

Influence of Authenticity on Electrical Energy Saving Behavioral Intention

Young-Doo Kim**
* This paper was developed from the 2018 ICAMA presentation of the author.
** Assistant Professor, Department of International Business, Hansei University, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea. Tel: +82-31-450-9811, e-mail: ydkim@hansei.ac.kr
October 15, 2018 October 30, 2018 November 10, 2018

Abstract

Purpose – Electrical energy saving is one of the practical virtues relating to sustainable living. Therefore, policy-makers has tried to find a way to change the behaviors of individuals to encourage them to actively practice electrical energy saving, even if they have never had this concern or have only passively practiced electrical energy saving to this point. Prior research related to electrical energy saving can be categorized into several types. The first is focused on consumer characteristics linked to electrical energy saving. These studies are based on individual or household socio-demographic variables (e.g., age, gender, household income, education level, occupants, marital status, number of households), and psycho-graphics (e.g., environmental consciousness, value, attitude, motivation, lifestyle). The second is focused on policies (e.g., monetary incentives, information sharing, social comparison, feedback), and technologies (e.g., energy-efficiency home appliances, energy-reduced products, renewable resources). People generally have a favorable attitude towards electrical energy saving, while electrical energy saving practices tend to be less favorable. Therefore, it is necessary for policy-makers to seek out gaps between attitudes and behaviors and find alternatives to reduce these gaps. This study investigates the influence of authenticity on the behavioral intention of electrical energy saving. It is supposed that electrical energy saving practices are likely to be stronger as authenticity of individual or household becomes stronger. This study reviews prior literature and examines various studies to provide an understanding of the relationships between authenticity and electrical energy saving behavioral intention.
Research design, data, and methodology – Hypothesis was drawn from analysis based on previous research. The items related to authenticity and electrical energy saving were selected from items found in previous research. To verify this hypothesis, data were collected via experimental survey method and the resulting data were analyzed using reliability analysis, correlation analysis, and hierarchical regression analysis.
Results – This study found that authenticity had a positive impact on the behavioral intention of electrical energy saving. The higher the perceived degree of authenticity, the higher the behavioral intention of electrical energy saving.
Conclusions – This study assesses the impact of authenticity on the behavioral intention of electrical energy saving. In order to enhance the practice of electrical energy saving, it is efficient strategy for policy-maker to improve the perceived authenticity of individuals.

JEL classifications: M31, M19, G29.

진정성이 전기에너지 절약 행동의도에 미치는 영향

김영두**

초록


    Figure

    Table

    Reference

    1. Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2009). How do socio-demographical and psychographical factors related to households' direct and indirect energy use and savings?. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(5), 711-720.
    2. Abre, J. M., Pereira, F. C., & Ferrão, P. (2012). Using pattern recognition to identify habitual behavior in residential electricity consumption. Energy and Buildings, 49, 479-487.
    3. Allen, J., Davis, D., & Soskin, M. (1993). Using coupon incentives in recycling aluminum: A market approach to energy conservation policy. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 27(2), 300-318.
    4. Blasi, A. (1980). Bridging moral cognition and moral action: A critical review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 88(1), 1-45.
    5. Boyraz, G., Waits, J. B. & Felix, V. A. (2014). Authenticity, life satisfaction, and distress: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61(3), 498-505.
    6. Brounen, D., Kok, N., & Quigley, J. M. (2012). Residential energy use and conservation: Economics and demographics. European Economic Review, 56(5), 931-945.
    7. Brzeskot, M., & Haupt. A. (2013). Environmental policy and the energy efficiency of vertically differentiated consumer products. Energy Economics, 36, 444-453.
    8. Carlsson-Kanyama, A., & Lindén, A.-L. (2007). Energy efficiency in residences-Challenges for women and men in the North. Energy Policy, 35(4), 2163-2172.
    9. Carroll, J., Lyons, S., & Denny, E. (2014). Reducing household electricity demand through smart metering: the role of improved information about energy saving. Energy Economics, 45, 234-243.
    10. Challis, C., Tierney, M., Todd, A., & Wilson, E. (2017). Human factors in dairy industry process control for energy reduction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 1319-1334.
    11. Claudy, M. C., Peterson, M., & O'Driscoll, A. (2013). Understanding the attitude-behavior gap for renewable energy systems using behavioral reasoning theory. Journal of Macromarketing, 33(4), 273-287.
    12. de Almeida, A., Fonseca, P., Schlomann, B., & Feilberg, N. (2011). Characterization of the household electricity consumption in the EU, potential energy savings and specific policy recommendations. Energy and Buildings, 43(8), 1884-1894.
    13. D'Oca, S., Hong, T., & Langevin, J. (2018). The human dimensions of energy use in buildings: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81(8), 731-742.
    14. Ed, K., & Söderholm, P. (2010). The devil is in the details: Household electricity saving behavior and the role of information. Energy Policy, 38(3), 1578-1587.
    15. Erickson, R. J. (1995). The importance of authenticity for self and society. Symbolic Interaction, 18(2), 121-144.
    16. Fan, L. W., Pan, S. J., Liu, G. Q., & Zhou, P. (2017). Does energy efficiency affect financial performance? Evidence from Chinese energy-intensive firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 151, 53-59.
    17. Frederiks, E., Stenner, K., & Hobman, E. V. (2015). Household energy use: Applying behavioral economics to understand consumer decision-making and behavior. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 1385-1394.
    18. Gadenne, D., Sharma, B., Kerr, D., & Smith, T. (2011). The influence of consumers' environmental beliefs and attitudes on energy saving behaviors. Energy Policy, 39(12), 7684-7694.
    19. Gao, L., Wang, S., Li, J., & Li, H. (2017). Application of the extended theory of planned behavior to understand individuals's energy saving behavior in workplace. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 127, 107-113.
    20. Gardner, W. L., Abolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R., & Walumbwa, F. (2005). "Can you see the real me?" A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development. Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 343-372.
    21. Gardner, W. L., Coglister, C. C., Davis, K. M., & Dickens, M. P. (2011). Authentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda. Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1120-1145.
    22. Gauthier. J., & Wooldridge, B. (2012). Influences on sustainable innovation adoption: Evidence from leadership in energy and environmental design. Business Strategy & the Environment, 21(2), 98-110.
    23. Grandey, A. A., Fisk, G. M., Mattila, A. S., Jansen, K. J., & Sideman, L. A. (2005). Is "service with a smile" enough? Authenticity of positive displays during service encounters. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96(1), 38-55.
    24. Groves, A. M. (2001). Authentic British food products: A review of consumer perceptions. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 25(3), 246-254.
    25. Grimmer, M., & Miles, M. (2017). With the best of intentions: A large sample test of the intention-behavior gap in pro-environmental consumer behavior. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41(1), 2-10.
    26. Guo, Z., Zhou, K., Zhang, C., Lu, X., Chen, W., & Yang, S. (2018). Residential electricity consumption behavior: Influencing factors, related theories and intervention strategies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81(Part 1), 399-412.
    27. Guèvremont, A. & Grohmann, B. (2016). The brand authenticity effect: Situational and individual-level moderators. European Journal of Marketing, 50(3/4), 602-620.
    28. Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2011). Relationships between authentic leadership, moral courage, and ethical and pro-social behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(4), 555-578.
    29. Hartmann, P., & Apaolaza-Ibáñez, V. (2012). Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward green energy brands: the roles of psychological benefits and environmental concern. Journal of Business Research, 65(9), 1254-1263.
    30. Hede, A.-M., Garma, R., Josiassen, A., & Thyne, M. (2014). Perceived authenticity of the visitor experience in museums: A conceptualization and initial empirical findings. European Journal of Marketing, 48(7/8), 1395-1412.
    31. Hede, A.-M., & Thyne, M. (2010). A journey to the authentic: Museum visitors and their negotiation of the inauthentic. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(7-8), 686-705.
    32. Hsiung, H.-H. (2012). Authentic leadership and employee voice behavior: A multi-level psychological process. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 349-361.
    33. Ilies, R., Morgeson, F. P., & Nahrgang, J. D. (2005). Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being: Understanding leader-follower outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 373-394.
    34. Kernis, M. H. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14(1), 1-26
    35. Kernis, M. H., & Goldman, B. M. (2006). A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research. In M. P. Zanna, Advances in experimental social psychology 38 (pp.284-357). San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
    36. Kowalczyk, C. M., & Pounders, K. R. (2016). Transforming celebrities through social media: The role of authenticity and emotional attachment. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 25(4), 345-356.
    37. Kuntz, J. R. C., & Abbott, M. (2017). Authenticity at work: A moderated mediation analysis. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 25(5), 789-803.
    38. Kyriakopoulos, G. and Arabatzis, G. (2016). Electrical energy storage systems in electricity generation: Energy policies, innovative technologies, and regulatory regimes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56, 1044-1067.
    39. Lakey, C. E., Kernis, M. H., Heppner, W. L., & Lance, C. E. (2008). Individual differences in authenticity and mindfulness as predictors of verbal defensiveness. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(1), 230-238.
    40. Lee, J. & Song, S. (2018). How can sporting goods ratailers achieve sustainable success?: concept of sport brand authenticity. Journal of Distribution Science, 16(4), 57-65.
    41. Leigh, T. W., Peters, C., & Shelton, J. (2006). The consumer quest for authenticity: The multiplicity of meanings within the MG subculture of consumption. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(4), 481-493.
    42. Leonidou, C. N., & Skarmeas, D. (2017). Gray shades of green: Causes and consequences of green skepticism. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(2), 401-415.
    43. Leygue, C., Ferguson, E., & Spence, A. (2017). Saving energy in the workplace: why, and for whom?, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 50-62.
    44. Lillemo, S. C. (2014). Measuring the effect of procrastination and environmental awareness on households' energy-saving behaviors: An empirical approach. Energy Policy, 66, 249-256.
    45. Martinsson, J., Lundqvist, L. J., & Sundström, A. (2011). Energy saving in Swedish households. The (relative) importance of environmental attitudes. Energy Policy, 39(9), 5182-5191.
    46. Moller, A. C., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self-determination theory and public policy: Improving the quality of consumer decisions without using coercion. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 25(1), 104-116.
    47. Neider, L. L., & Schriesheim, C. A. (2011). The authentic leadership inventory (ALI): Development and empirical tests. Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1146-1164.
    48. Nguyen, T. N., Lobo, A., & Greenland, S. (2016). Pro-environmental purchase behavior: the role of consumers' biospheric values. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 33, 98-108.
    49. Ntona, E., Arabatzis, G., & Kyriakopoulos, G. (2015). Energy saving: Views and attitudes of students in secondary education. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 46, 1-15.
    50. Oliver, R. L., & Swan, J. E. (1989). Consumer perceptions of interpersonal equity and satisfaction in transactions: A field survey approach. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 21-35.
    51. Ozawa, A., Furusato, R., & Yoshida, Y. (2016). Determining the relationship between a household's lifestyle and its electricity consumption in Japan by analyzing measured electric load profiles. Energy and Buildings, 119, 200-210.
    52. Park, E.-J., Kim, C.-G., Kim, M.-S., & Han, J.-H. (2015). Justice and authenticity of service recovery: Effects on customer behavioral intention. Journal of Distribution Science, 13(2), 63-73.
    53. Park, J., Javalgi, R., & Wachter, M. (2016). Product ethnicity and perceived consumer authenticity: The moderating role of product type. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33(6), 458-468.
    54. Peus, C., Wesche, J. S., Streicher, B., Braun, S., & Frey, D. (2012). Authentic leadership: An empirical test of its antecedents, consequences, and mediating mechanisms. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 331-348.
    55. Press, M., & Arnould, E. J. (2009). Constraints on sustainable energy consumption: Market system and public policy challenges and opportunities. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 28(1), 102-111.
    56. Ryan, R. L., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
    57. Sanquist, T. F., Orr, H., Shui, B., & Bittner, A. (2012). Lifestyle factors in U.S. residential electricity consumption. Energy Policy, 42, 354-464.
    58. Schallehn, M., Burmann, C., & Riley, N. (2014). Brand authenticity: Model development and empirical testing. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 23(3), 192-199.
    59. Schultz, P. W., Estrada, M., Schmitt, J., Sokoloski, R., & Silvasend, N. (2015). Using in-home displays to provide smart meter feedback about household electricity consumption: A randomized control trial comparing kilowatts, cost, and social norms. Energy, 90(Part 1), 315-358.
    60. Schwartz, D., de Bruin, W. B., Fischhoff, B., & Lave, L. (2015). Advertising energy saving programs: The potential environmental cost of emphasizing monetary savings. Journal of Environmental Psychology: Applied, 21(2), 158-166.
    61. Seong, N.-C., Moon, J.-S., Park, K.-H. (2016). The effect of distribution enterprise leader's coaching behavior on organizational citizenship behavior and turnover intention: mediating role of authentic leadership and moderating role of emotional intelligence. Journal of Distribution Science, 14(1), 75-84.
    62. Shamir, B., & Eilam, G. (2005). "What's your story?" A life-stories approach to authentic leadership development. Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 395-417.
    63. Spiggle, S., Nguyen, H. T., & Caravella, M. (2012). More than fit: Brand extension authenticity. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(6), 967-983.
    64. Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309-317.
    65. Sweeney, J. C., Kresling, J., Webb, D., Soutar, G. N., & Mazzarol, T. (2013). Energy saving behaviors: Development of a practice-based model. Energy Policy, 61, 371-381.
    66. Sweeney, J. C., Webb, D., Mazzarol, T., & Soutar, G. N. (2014). Self-determination theory and word of mouth about energy-saving behaviors: An online experiment. Psychology & Marketing, 31(9), 698-716.
    67. Thøgersen, J. & Grønhøj, A. (2010). Electricity saving in households - a social cognitive approach. Energy Policy, 38(12), 7732-7743.
    68. Tiefenbeck, V., Staake, T., Roth, K., & Sachs, O. (2013). For better or for worse? empirical evidence of moral licensing in a behavioral energy conservation campaign. Energy Policy, 57, 160-171.
    69. Toor, S., & Ofori, G. (2009). Authenticity and its influence on psychological well-being and contingent self-esteem of leaders in Singapore construction sector. Construction Management and Economics, 27(3), 299-313.
    70. Trotta, G. (2018). Factors affecting energy-saving behaviors and energy efficiency investments in British households. Energy Policy, 114, 529-539.
    71. Van Houwelingen, J. H., & van Raaij, W. F. (1989). The effect of goal-setting and daily electronic feedback on in-home energy use. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(1), 98-105.
    72. Wallis, H., Nachreiner, M., & Matthies, E. (2016). Adolescents and electricity consumption: investigating sociodemographic, economic, and behavioral influences on electricity consumption in household. Energy Policy, 94, 224-234.
    73. Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure?. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89-126.
    74. Wang, Z., Zhang, B., Yin, J., & Zhang, Y. (2011). Determinants and policy implications for household electricity-saving behavior: Evidence from Beijing, China. Energy Policy, 39(6), 3550-3557.
    75. Webb, D., Soutar, G. N., Mazzarol, T., & Saldaris, P. (2013). Self-determination theory and consumer behavioral change: Evidence from a household energy- saving behavior study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 59-66.
    76. Weiss, M., Razinskas, S., Backmann, J., & Hogel, M. (2018). Authentic leadership and leaders' mental well-being: An experience sampling study. Leadership Quarterly, 29(2), 309-321.
    77. Wilson, C. (2014), Evaluating communication to optimize consumer-directed energy efficiency interventions. Energy Policy, 74, 300-310.
    78. Wilson, C., & Marselle, M. R. (2016). Insights from psychological about the design and implementation of energy interventions using the behavioral change wheel. Energy Research & Social Science, 19, 177-191.
    79. Yang, S., Zhang, Y., & Zhao, D. (2016). Who exhibits more energy-saving behavior in direct and indirect ways in China? The role of psychological factors and socio-demographics. Energy Poicy, 93, 196-205.
    80. Yohanis, Y. G., Mondol, J. D., Wright, A., & Norton, B. (2008). Real-life energy use in the UK: How occupancy and dwelling characteristics affect domestic electricity use. Energy and Buildings, 40(6), 1053-1059.
    81. Yue, T., Long, R., & Chen, H. (2013). Factors influencing energy-saving behavior of urban households in Jiangsu Province. Energy Policy, 62, 665-675.
    82. Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., & Zhou, G. (2013). Antecedents of employee electricity saving behavior in organizations: An empirical study based on norm activation. Energy Policy, 62, 1120-1127.