Journal Search Engine
Search Advanced Search Adode Reader(link)
Download PDF Export Citaion korean bibliography PMC previewer
ISSN : 2233-4165(Print)
ISSN : 2233-5382(Online)
Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business Vol.9 No.8 pp.35-40

Learning Process Monitoring of e-Learning for Corporate Education

Do-Hun Kim*,Hyojung Jung**
* First Author, Professor, Elementary Education, Chinju National University of Education, Korea. Tel: +82-55-740-1301, E-mail:
** Corresponding Author, Professor, School of General Education, Dankook University, Korea. Tel: +82-31-8005-3972, E-mail:
July 2, 2018. July 5, 2018. August 15, 2018.


Purpose – The purpose of this study is to conduct a monitoring study on the learning process of e-learning contents. This study has two research objectives. First, by conducting monitoring research on the learning process, we aim to explore the implications for content development that reflects future student needs. Second, we want to collect empirical basic data on the estimation of appropriate amount of learning.
Research design, data, and methodology – This study is a case study of learner's learning process in e-learning. After completion of the study, an in–depth interview was made after conducting a test to measure the total amount of cognitive load and the level of engagement that occurred during the learning process. The tool used to measure cognitive load is NASA-TLX, a subjective cognitive load measurement method. In the monitoring process, we observe external phenomena such as page movement and mouse movement path, and identify cognitive activities such as Think-Aloud technique.
Results – In the total of three research subjects, the two courses showed excess learning time compared to the learning time, and one course showed less learning time than the learning time. This gives the following implications for content development. First, it is necessary to consider the importance of selecting the target and contents level according to the level of the subject. Second, it is necessary to design the learner participation activity that meets the learning goal level and to calculate the appropriate time accordingly. Third, it is necessary to design appropriate learning support strategy according to the learning task. This should be considered in designing lessons. Fourth, it is necessary to revitalize contents design centered on learning activities such as simulation.
Conclusions - The implications of the examination system are as follows. First, it can be confirmed that there is difficulty in calculating the amount of learning centered on learning time and securing objective objectivity. Second, it can be seen that there are various variables affecting the actual learning time in addition to the content amount. Third, there is a need for reviewing the system of examination of learning amount centered on 'learning time'.

JEL Classifications: I21, I23, I25.

기업교육을 위한 인터넷 원격훈련 학습과정 모니터링 연구






  1. Agrwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time Files When You’re Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs about Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665-694.
  2. Atkinson, R., & Shiffrin, R. (1976). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. Spence, & J. Spence (Eds.). The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol 2). New York: Academic Press.
  3. Im, Y. W., Lee, O. H., Jung, M. S ., & Lee, J. E. (2012). An analysis of learner’s perception and current condition of ‘digital content running time’ in higher education. Korean Journal of the Learning Science, 6(2), 61-78.
  4. Jung, H. J. (2017). A Study on the Strategies of Developing e-Learning Contents for Adult Learners. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 17(4), 587-608.
  5. Jung, H. J. (2018). Trends and Future Directions of Corporate e-learning Contents. International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 9(2), 65-72.
  6. Lee, J. E., Kwon, S. J., & Jung, H. J. (2018). Introduction and Activation Strategies for Smart training of Corporate. International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 9(5), 83-91.
  7. Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & Van Gerven, P. W. M.(2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 63-71
  8. Salehi, M., Zadeh, F. N., Saei, M. J., & Rostami, V. (2013). Reforming Accounting Education Content to Fulfill Business Environment Needs. The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 4(2), 5-11.